Just when you thought the news media was a monolithic entity working in lockstep to exploit advertisers of geriatric medical supplies and to destroy America, there comes this refreshing nugget from the local news in Atlanta GA:
Andrea Sneiderman, the accused master criminal / seductress who, prosecutors say, manipulated one would-be paramour to kill her husband so she could get with another paramour, filed a legal brief last week. It wasn’t a huge story, but it was significant enough to warrant coverage in the ongoing Sneiderman saga. And varying news organizations chose to stress various aspects of the brief.
It helped that her attorney used an abundance of colorful language to debunk what he called the prosecution’s “fantastical” theory behind Mrs. Sneiderman’s alleged crime. There was a lot from which to choose.
“Civil attorneys spar over Sneiderman’s love life” was the headline on the AJC’s web site. Christian Boone wrote the piece, whose first quote was that the accusations against Mrs. Sneiderman were “rife with false allegations.”
Newspaper reporters used to always disclaim the headlines of stories that appeared in print. Newspaper headlines were, and presumably still are, written by specialists who combined typeface options and sizes to fit the available space above the story. Some of them are damned clever. “Ford to City: Drop Dead” and “Headless Woman in Topless Bar” were much more memorable than the stories that followed.
When I put a story on 11alive.com, I always write the headline. Though we have a whole pod full of web specialists, the web lacks the space-and-size restrictions that old-school newspaper headline writers deal with. So reporters write online headlines. Mine are usually too wordy.
I don’t know if Boone wrote the Sneiderman headline, which was nonetheless catchy and accurate.
On WSB-TV’s site, Mike Petchenik’s piece appears under the headline “Sneiderman denies claims involving 3rd man.”
At WGCL, Renee Starzyk’s headline was an eye-grabber: “New motions reveal details in Andrea Sneiderman love affair.” She declined to quote from the brief, however, and instead quoted extensively (as did Petchenik) from an interview with attorney Ken Hodges. This is the first time I’ve heard of Mrs. Sneiderman’s relationship with Joseph Dell referred to as a “love affair,” a characterization I have thus far avoided.
My story on 11alive.com dipped into the back pages of the brief for a headline: “Sneiderman: Prosecutors want to enrage Neuman into testifying.” In this part of the brief, Mrs. Sneiderman’s attorneys contended that prosecutors cooked up the love quadrangle story in order to taunt the jailed Neuman into spitefully appearing on the witness stand to incriminate Mrs. Sneiderman in the murder of her husband.
I stuck to the brief and skipped the outside expertise of Mr. Hodges. My headline was catchy. I’ll even go out on a limb and say it was a bit sensational. I’m OK with that, because it accurately described new information contained in the story. And my job, among other things, is to draw eyeballs to my TV station’s material.
The news business is often unscientific and, in terms of its decision-making, even a bit sloppy. Yet the end results frequently make us appear to work in lockstep.
Except for when we don’t.