Let’s say you’re in the US Army. Let’s say you’re back from a tour of duty in Iraq. Maybe it’s your second or third. You settle in for a little TV news. You switch on WXIA at 11pm Thursday.

You see a report by Julie Wolfe about an injured soldier. Within the story, the reporter uses the word “hero” to describe the injured soldier. Then she uses it again. “Hero.”

She attributes the characterization to the soldier’s crying mother. The emotion is real. The mother’s house is festooned with paint and ribbon honoring the injured soldier, who’s home as she rehabilitates her injury.

But then the details sink in: The soldier joined the Army only a few weeks ago. She is in basic training, meaning she hasn’t seen combat or even active duty. The injury to her leg— a stress fracture— occurred in boot camp. When she’s done with her rehab, she returns to boot camp to finish basic training, at which point her eight year commitment to the Army begins.

“Hero” is a word that the media loves to overuse. Wolfe’s story is a classic example. The word is almost always attributable to somebody else– though frequently, it’s done at the prompting of the reporter: Do you consider (blank) a hero? Yes, says the tearful respondent.

Wolfe made it clear that the young woman joined the Army to help support her mother. The mom considers her a family hero, not a war hero.

Meantime, you’re an Iraq veteran who finished boot camp years earlier. You wear a combat patch on your uniform. Maybe you’ve lost some buddies or had some close calls yourself. You watch WXIA’s 11pm news Thursday. You see this teenager, still in boot camp, called a “hero” on TV. Twice.

This entry was posted in wolfe julie, WXIA on by .

About live apt fire

Doug Richards is a reporter at WXIA-TV. This is his personal blog. WXIA-TV has nothing whatsoever to do with this blog, under any circumstances, in any form. For anything written herein, Doug accepts sole credit and full blame. Follow him on Twitter: @richardsdoug. All rights reserved. Thanks for visiting.

6 thoughts on ““Hero”

  1. rptrcub

    It is an overused word. I mean no disrespect. But in a society where you’d better “support the troops” by agreeing with what your government does, people are afraid — the media are afraid — of coming across as anti-troop and therefore anti-American. Flame away.

  2. Edward

    I agree. We’ve become a society of symbolism without substance. You’d better wear that flag lapel pin and you’d better have a yellow plastic ribbon on your car bumper or you’re “UnAmerican!”. Instead of instilling patriotism, we’ve instilled artificial jingoism. Calling this enlistee a “hero” in the context of the report has become typical and thus cheapens the word.

  3. bigear

    I consider most police officers heros despite them never pulling a gun. It may have been a better turn of phrase to say something like “mom considers her daughter her hero.” Might have fit better.

  4. Donald

    A hero by definition is a person admired or idealized for courage.

    A person who volunteers to participate in a noble cause a great distance away and will put themselves in mortal danger meets the definition.

  5. scott hedeen

    i’m ok with what the reporter did. I’m over the whole debate about what a local news reporter labels a person. if it’s not libel (slander? libel is written .. slander is spoken… is tv news …both?) and it makes slot…. then the story fills the newscast. done and done.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s